DOT Delay Compensation Rule That Was Withdrawn: What It Would Have Paid

DOT delay compensation rule withdrawn 2025 was the most significant proposed expansion of US passenger rights since the 1970s. Issued as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in late 2023, the proposal would have created EU261-style fixed cash compensation for US carrier delays caused by carrier-controlled events. The rule would have paid USD 200 for delays of 3-6 hours, USD 800 for delays of 6-9 hours, USD 1,400 for delays over 9 hours or cancellations within 14 days. The Trump administration withdrew the proposal in early 2025 before finalization. The 14 CFR Part 260 cash refund rule remains the active US passenger right.

What was lost: fixed cash compensation. What was kept: cash refund on declined rebookings. The withdrawal preserved the unused-fare refund right but blocked the additional fixed cash that EU261 provides.

• ›

  3-6 hour delay: USD 200 per passenger.

• ›

  6-9 hour delay: USD 800 per passenger.

• ›

  Over 9 hour delay or cancellation within 14 days: USD 1,400 per passenger.

• ›

  Carrier-controlled events only: weather and ATC delays excluded.

• ›

  Per-passenger basis: family of 4 on a delayed flight would have collected up to USD 5,600 cumulative.

• ›

  Stack with cash refund: separate from 14 CFR Part 260 refund right.

• ›

  Trump 2025 deregulatory priorities: early-administration regulatory rollbacks targeted multiple pending consumer protection rules.

• ›

  Industry opposition: Airlines for America (A4A) filed extensive comments arguing operational impossibility and cost concerns.

• ›

  Carrier-controlled definition disputes: industry argued that defining 'carrier-controlled' was operationally infeasible.

• ›

  Cost-benefit analysis criticism: industry argued DOT's cost analysis underestimated implementation cost.

• ›

  No statutory codification: unlike 14 CFR Part 260 (codified in FAA Reauth 2024), the delay compensation rule was rulemaking-only and easier to withdraw.

• ›

  EU261: EUR 250 (short-haul, up to 1,500 km), EUR 400 (medium-haul, 1,500-3,500 km), EUR 600 (long-haul, over 3,500 km).

• ›

  Withdrawn US proposal: USD 200 (3-6 hours), USD 800 (6-9 hours), USD 1,400 (over 9 hours).

• ›

  Conversion approximation: EUR 600 ≈ USD 660. The proposed US rule paid less for short delays but more for long delays.

• ›

  EU261 trigger: 3+ hour delay at arrival, regardless of cause (subject to extraordinary circumstances).

• ›

  Withdrawn US trigger: 3+ hour delay caused by carrier-controlled event. Narrower than EU261.

The withdrawn proposal does not affect the rights that did go into effect:

• ›

  14 CFR Part 260 cash refund: full unused fare refunded to original payment method on cancellation or significant delay (3+ hours domestic, 6+ hours international). 7 business day credit card processing.

• ›

  Class downgrade: refund of fare difference under Part 260.

• ›

  Baggage fee refund: substantially delayed bag triggers fee refund.

• ›

  Tarmac Delay Rule: 3-hour domestic / 4-hour international deplaning right.

• ›

  Denied boarding compensation: USD 1,550 cash for involuntary denied boarding.

• ›

  ACAA service animal: accommodation rights and DOT enforcement.

• ›

  EU regulation, not affected by US administration changes.

• ›

  Applies to EU-licensed carriers and on EU departures regardless of operator.

• ›

  EUR 250-600 per passenger by distance band on 3+ hour delays.

• ›

  Distance bands: up to 1,500 km, 1,500-3,500 km, over 3,500 km.

• ›

  Stack with US DOT cash refund where applicable.

• ›

  Future Democratic administration: could re-propose. Rulemaking takes 12-24 months minimum from NPRM to final rule.

• ›

  FAA Reauthorization 2028 cycle: potential for legislative codification of delay compensation. Congressional action is durable but requires bipartisan support.

• ›

  State-level pilots: federal preemption blocks state delay compensation rules. New York and California efforts have failed.

• ›

  EU261 reciprocity argument: some advocate for matching EU261 amounts to align international travel rules. Has not gained traction politically.

• ›

  Industry compromise paths: voluntary carrier compensation programs (some carriers already offer) are possible without regulation.

1. 1

   Decline rebookings explicitly under 14 CFR Part 260 for cash refunds.

2. 2

   File EU261 on EU-flag transatlantic delays for fixed cash compensation.

3. 3

   Stack travel insurance for documented incidentals during delays.

4. 4

   Article 19 documented loss for international business delays.

5. 5

   Do not expect EU261-equivalent fixed cash on US carrier domestic delays in current framework.

The withdrawn delay compensation rule does not change the rights that exist. Cash refund under 14 CFR Part 260, EU261 cash compensation on EU-flag delays, Montreal Convention international. Use the delayed flight worth calculator to estimate. See the US DOT passenger rights pillar for the framework, Biden vs Trump DOT policy: what changed for airline passengers for the political context, and the EU261 passenger rights pillar for international rights. Start a claim.